Software Procurement & Risk Assessment
Evaluate software risk during procurement, acquisitions, and vendor assessments using SBOM analysis.
Overview
When evaluating software for purchase or when acquiring companies, you need rapid assessment of:
- Security vulnerabilities in the software you're acquiring
- License compliance risks that could affect your operations
- Component quality and vendor support status
- Regulatory compliance with your standards
- Integration complexity with your existing systems
SBOMs enable this assessment without requiring deep technical analysis or source code access.
Why Software Procurement Matters
Poor procurement decisions can result in:
- Security breaches from vulnerable software you didn't know about
- License violations that create legal liability
- Compliance failures with your regulatory requirements
- Integration headaches with incompatible components
- Hidden costs from unexpected vendor lock-in or support issues
- Operational disruptions from poor quality software
The SBOM-Driven Procurement Process
Phase 1: Request & Collect SBOMs
During vendor evaluation:
- Request SBOM as part of your procurement requirements
- Include SBOM generation in your vendor questionnaire
- Make SBOM availability a requirement for enterprise customers
For acquisitions:
- Request SBOMs for all applications and systems
- Include in due diligence process
- Assess software portfolio before closing deal
Phase 2: Analyze Software Composition
Upload SBOMs to SBOM Observer and analyze:
Component Inventory:
- Total number of components
- Distribution of libraries and frameworks
- Version diversity (modern vs. outdated)
Technology Stack:
- Programming languages used
- Popular frameworks and libraries
- Vendor lock-in dependencies
Supply Chain Risk:
- Components with single maintainers
- Inactive or abandoned projects
- Commercial vs. open-source distribution
Phase 3: Security Assessment
Vulnerability Analysis:
- Known CVEs in components
- Severity distribution (critical, high, medium, low)
- Patch availability and age
- Components with active security support
Risk Scoring:
- Critical vulnerabilities require immediate patching
- Medium vulnerabilities need remediation plan
- Low vulnerabilities acceptable with monitoring
Vulnerability Report Example:
- 3 Critical CVEs (require immediate fix)
- 12 High severity (fix within 30 days)
- 24 Medium severity (fix within 90 days)
- 45 Low severity (monitor and plan)Phase 4: License & Compliance Check
License Analysis:
- Identify all licenses in use
- Check for problematic combinations
- Verify compatibility with your business model
Compliance Verification:
- Check against your security policies
- Verify regulatory compliance (NIS2, CRA, etc.)
- Assess vendor compliance standards
Policy Violation Report:
- 5 GPL components (requires review)
- 2 end-of-life components (must upgrade)
- 8 components without vendor support (high risk)
- DORA requirement violations: 3 componentsPhase 5: Generate Risk Report
Create a structured risk assessment:
Executive Summary:
- Overall risk level (green/yellow/red)
- Key findings and recommendations
- Integration and cost implications
Detailed Analysis:
- Component inventory details
- Vulnerability assessment
- License compliance status
- Regulatory compliance gaps
- Remediation costs and timeline
Recommendations:
- Proceed with caution/approval/rejection
- Required fixes before deployment
- Post-acquisition roadmap
Real-World Procurement Scenarios
Scenario 1: SaaS Vendor Evaluation
You're evaluating three SaaS platforms for customer data management.
Process:
- Request SBOMs from all three vendors
- Upload to SBOM Observer
- Compare against your security policies
- Check for license conflicts with your stack
- Verify regulatory compliance (especially data handling)
Result:
- Vendor A: 45 critical vulnerabilities, unknown licenses → High Risk
- Vendor B: 3 high vulnerabilities, all compliant → Acceptable
- Vendor C: 0 critical, but GPL license → Rejected (incompatible business model)
Decision: Proceed with Vendor B, negotiate security roadmap for high vulnerabilities.
Scenario 2: Merger & Acquisition Due Diligence
You're acquiring a competitor with 50+ applications.
Process:
- Request SBOMs for all applications
- Upload entire portfolio to SBOM Observer
- Scan against your compliance requirements
- Identify integration challenges
- Assess modernization needs
Findings:
- 234 total components across portfolio
- 156 vulnerable components (requires patching)
- 23 end-of-life components (require modernization)
- Estimated remediation cost: $2M over 18 months
- Integration timeline: 12 months for core systems
Impact on Deal: Adjust acquisition price based on modernization costs, create integration roadmap.
Scenario 3: Open-Source Library Adoption
You're considering adopting a new open-source library for critical functionality.
Process:
- Get SBOM from project (check project repository or generate it)
- Upload to SBOM Observer
- Check library's dependencies
- Verify license compatibility
- Assess vulnerability and maintenance status
Analysis:
- Library: 12 dependencies
- 2 GPL dependencies (evaluate licensing impact)
- 5 outdated dependencies (library maintenance concern)
- Active development and community support
Decision: Adopt with caveat - library maintainer must update dependencies.
Scenario 4: Cloud Platform Migration
You're migrating from Platform A to Platform B and need to understand both stacks.
Process:
- Get SBOMs for both platforms
- Compare components and versions
- Identify potential breaking changes
- Plan dependency migration
- Test compatibility before cutover
Result:
- 45% shared components across platforms
- 23 components need version upgrades
- 8 components have no direct equivalent → custom development needed
- Migration effort: 3 months
Procurement Checklist
✅ Before Procurement:
- Define security requirements and policies
- Create procurement questionnaire including SBOM request
- Establish what makes software unacceptable
- Get executive alignment on risk tolerance
✅ During Evaluation:
- Request SBOM from all vendors
- Upload to SBOM Observer
- Run against your policy requirements
- Document risk assessment
- Get approval from security team
✅ Before Deployment:
- Update SBOM to current version
- Re-run compliance checks
- Plan remediation for any violations
- Get sign-off from operations and security
✅ During Integration:
- Monitor for new vulnerabilities
- Track vendor patches and updates
- Update your inventory with new components
- Communicate risks to stakeholders
Best Practices
✅ Do:
- Make SBOM a procurement requirement
- Assess risk early in evaluation process
- Compare alternatives systematically
- Document assessment for audits
- Plan remediation before deployment
- Build vendor relationships on security
- Request vulnerability notifications
❌ Don't:
- Deploy software without security assessment
- Ignore license compliance requirements
- Assume vendor promises without verification
- Skip policy checking due to time pressure
- Forget post-deployment monitoring
- Negotiate away security requirements
- Deploy critical software with known critical CVEs
Risk Scoring Framework
Critical Risk (Red Flag)
- Multiple critical vulnerabilities without patches
- Incompatible licenses for your business model
- Regulatory compliance violations
- No vendor support or inactive project
- Recommendation: Reject or require remediation
High Risk (Yellow Flag)
- Several high-severity vulnerabilities with patches available
- Minor license concerns with available solutions
- Limited vendor support or maturity questions
- Recommendation: Proceed with caution, plan remediation
Acceptable Risk (Green Light)
- Low or no critical/high vulnerabilities
- Compatible licenses
- Active vendor support or maintenance
- Meets compliance requirements
- Recommendation: Proceed with standard onboarding